Copyright

10.31

http://www.copyright.gov/docs/priorities.pdf - nd its the entertainment industry's two favorite bills: PROTECT IP/E-PARASITE and the felony streaming bill. The full report (pdf) also supports the RIAA bailout bill/performance rights act, also known as the extra tax on radio stations,

10.04 http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2010/09/ninth-circuit-says-consumers-may-not-own-their-software.html Ninth Circuit says consumers may not own their software from =Appeals Court Destroys First Sale; You Don't Own Your Software Anymore =

=Trio Of Important First Sale Cases All Hit Appeals Court In Early June =

10.03 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1839907

08.27.

Copyright Enforcement of Non-Copyright Terms: //MDY v. Blizzard// and //Krause v. Titleserv//
http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/ -

08.26

= Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 04: "THIS LAND IS MY LAND" = 15:33

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyygiXMzRk&feature=relmfu

08.25 http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2011/08/16/an-easy-fair-use-ruling-but-with-a-message/ - [|Brownmark Films v. Comedy Partners], This case is a clear example of the active defense of fair use. The judge dismiss the case even before the trial. We need to think of a fair use as our right rather than defense on infringement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yT4RZy1t3s&feature=relmfu - surrogate mother Present case - ask opinions (agree why / disagree why) - present court decision - introduce philosopher's idea that match this idea( Anderson)

07.30

a great article http://piracy.ssrc.org/hadopi-says-lets-try-cutting-off-nose-to-spite-face/ http://www.hadopi.fr/download/hadopiT0.pdf an articles which testify the relationship between digital piracy and the revenue of the entertainment industry. [] [] - MPAAA spent $400,000 for lobbying the vice president and other law enforcement agencies on copyright issue.

=Industry Suppressed Report Showing Users Of Shuttered 'Pirate' Site Probably Helped Movie Industry... july 21th from techdirt =

from the //well,-look-at-that// dept
We've seen study after study after study after study after study showing, contrary to the claim of the industry and certain politicians that users of file sharing sites are pure "freeloaders" who are "leeching," that the users tend to be //larger// spenders on media and ancillary products. So it's really not a huge surprise that a new study would come out saying the same thing...

03.30 [Article] Oberholzer-Gee, Felix, and Koleman Strumpf, 2009. File-Sharing and Copyright. //NBER's Innovation Policy and the Economy series,// volume 10. ed. Joushua Lerner and Scott Stern. MIT Press.

03.24

[Legal Case] http://www.iparadigms.com/iParadigms_03-11-08_Opinion.pdf - turnitin vs A.V case from http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2008/03/clickthrough_ag.htm [book] http://nextdigitaldecade.com/ndd_book.pdf (next digital decade - must-read book) [Article] http://www.scribd.com/doc/51217629/LSE-MPPbrief1-creative-destruction-and-copyright-protection In this article, the author stated that there is no conclusive correlation between file-sharing and decline of the revenue of music industry [Article] http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/09-132.pdf - This article examines the relation between file-sharing and music industry from http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2010/12/01/fantasy-reality-in-intellectual-property-policy/ [Article] http://www.iccwbo.org/uploadedFiles/BASCAP/Pages/Building%20a%20Digital%20Economy%20-%20TERA%281%29.pdf - one of the most famous articles that frequently circulated for pro-copyright group.(Building a digital economy) [Re:Article] [] - criticism on this paper. [Article] http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf - the second famous article from pro-copyright group (observations on efforts to quantify the economic effects of counterfeit and pirated goods) [Book chapter] : http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8634.pdf - This is one chapter of book that I found from http://www.researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork/ originally from http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2011/02/submission-to-uk-independent-review-of-ip-and-growth/index.htm (article)

http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ippd-dppi.nsf/eng/ip01457.html - Canada's governement study : file sharing helps music industry.

http://www.authorama.com/free-culture-5.html : Lawrence Lessig's free culture

03.23 [Article] http://www.apo.org.au/research/impact-internet-piracy-australian-economy - The first article that I read to try to quantify the impact of internet piracy on a country's economy (Feb, 2011) [Re:Article] [] - this article questions the previous one. [Re:Article] [] - another criticism

[Book chapter] http://elearn.tru.ca/ ; Re-Thinking E-Learning Research: Foundations, Methods and Practices

12.07

//The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind// [] - by james boyle from

= [|Getting Rid Of Fantasy Numbers In The Copyright Debates] in [] =

11. 18 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFdcPc-4Ris&feature=related - lessig remic http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BKDFsVGN9g&feature=related -Top 25 Pop 2009 Remix



11.11. - INFRINGE CASE FROM http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=wmlr Pamela Samuelson and Tara Wheatland, //Statutory Damages in Copyright Law: A Remedy in Need of Reform//, 51 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 439 (2009), http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol51/iss2/5

11.03

Porno site

10.30 http://hurips.blogspot.com/# - korean ip blog

10.29

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.07/posts.html?pg=7 - happy birthday to you is copyright infringement by 2030. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1111624 - article : copyright and the world's most popular song http://freeculture.org/blog/2010/10/21/good-morning-to-happy-birthday-for-all/

[|Asheesh Laroia] received a M.S. in computer science at the Johns Hopkins University in 2007. He received his B.A. in cognitive science from JHU. In 2004, he filed a deposition in the [|Diebold lawsuit] that first earned the student free culture movement coverage in the national media. A long-time participant in free software and free culture, he interned at [|Creative Commons] in 2006. http://freeculture.org/about/

In turn, Diebold had violated section 512(f) of the DMCA, which makes it unlawful to use DMCA takedown threats when the copyright holder knows that infringement has not actually occured.
 * Outcome:** In addition to creating the first [|caselaw] applying 512(f) of the DMCA to remedy abusive copyright #|claims under the DMCA, Diebold subsequently agreed to pay $125,000 in damages and fees.

10.28. This articles reports the extensive ongoing debate regarding to drm. Authors stated that "while some have concluded that working to develop technological protections for fair use is a futile endeavor,163 I believe it may be worthwhile" (p. 88) =10.27= http://www.opensourcecinema.org/ - open source cinema http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F93z5aFkuY&feature=channel - remix manifesto trailers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oar9glUCL0&feature=related = trailers =http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdwN6rRU0Xk&NR=1 - RIP: A Remix Manifesto (part 1) = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uonb39HWmQ0&feature=related - 1:00~2:27 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ8UCk9BaZs&feature=related - part 3 3:00~5:00 / 7:00~8:00 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hypvP_XN0po&feature=related - part 4 0:38 / 1:16 / 4:00 lessig **4:57 / 5:43~6:30** http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfSiQjFmcZw&feature=related - part 5 (1:20 - a silly case) 2:00 / 8: 02 big media / 8:19 / 2:00 ~ 2:50...3:29.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nDOZgR4B5k&feature=related - part 7 (2:38) 4:54 / 5:20 / 8:29 / 9:10 / 9:40 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPtRaSDYT3k&feature=related - part 8 (1:00) (3:42) **(4:50) 6:46**
 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sRY9fRyz-c&feature=related - 2:59 / 3: 37**

kinetic typography 2:00~2:50 / 5:33 / 6:17 / 6:55 / 7:23

=10. 26= [] - data mashup [] - articles = **10.25** =

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSTvTLCupgw&feature=channel - copyright independent criminal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxxT8-jhbe4&feature=related - Alternative freedom (Both Richard Stallman and Larry lessig are on this documentary film) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbXLp2z6xL4&feature=list_related&a=GxdCwVVULXcToK2Ddoy-aandrcbLXM0N&list=ML&playnext=1 - grey album http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKYe1KiwywE&feature=channel - remix jibjab best [] - fred's comments on copyright

=10.23= =Author of this article : Eric Nelson= =http://www.arcadia.edu/academic/default.aspx?id=4353=

=10.22= http://chronicle.com/article/Play-It-Again-Professor/124989/ chronicles articles =**Articles**=

It has also been argued that alternative types of statutory intervention may be more effi cient. Alternatives discussed in the literature include levies on copying technology, direct subsidies, or stipends and awards. All of these alternatives are problematic because they replace the market mechanism with central control at least in part. Nevertheless, considering persistent problems with copyright systems in many markets over recent years, some of these alternatives have been receiving greater attention. (p. 8)

Advances in copying technology play a central role in the economic literature on copyright. The diffusion of digital copying technology may be qualitatively different from previous advances in copying technology because the variable costs of generating and disseminating unauthorised copies are approaching zero. (p. 8)

Copyright policy and digitization (p. 9)

The central empirical question is whether over time the supply of copyright works diminishes because of unauthorised copying. This issue has not received much systematic attention. (p. 10)

These studies have found no evidence that copyright #|term extensions or the diffusion of digital copying technology (that diminish the de facto strength of copyright protection) have affected supply signifi cantly. (p. 10)

Four gaps in the literature are of particular concern. First, the effect of digital copying on user welfare needs to be assessed more comprehensively. An important aspect of this would be covered in studies on the consequences of unauthorised copying for the legitimate supply of copyright works. Second, several empirical studies on the effect of digital copying have found that major incumbents seem to suffer while fringe suppliers and newcomers may even benefi t from the exposure. This might illustrate the extent to which ‘one-sizefi ts-all’ copyright arrangements favour some market participants over others and such unintended, distorting effects of the law may have to come under scrutiny. A third, related point is that copyright regulates a diverse group of markets – from musical recordings to research articles – on the basis of similar principles. The case for copyright will differ between different markets and these differences could be explored more thoroughly.

Fourth, it has been argued that the transaction costs and market #|power associated with copyright systems might not only inhibit follow-up creativity but also socially desirable aspects of technological innovation in the affected markets (in particular concerning new ways of disseminating works). Any obstacles to technological transition may be particularly problematic in the course of digitisation, as the expectation is that great productivity increases will be had from further applications of digital ICT in the production and dissemination of copyright works. (p. 11)

the key question is how the supply of copyright works is affected by unauthorised copying. Theory suggests that this is not a trivial question. Arguably, the long-run perspective is more important. (p. 12)

whether copyright could improve the situation without excessive unintended consequences. (p. 13)
 * Benefi ts Costs**
 * Short run**
 * Monopoly rents for rights holders and**
 * control of types of use**
 * 1. Administration costs**
 * 2. Transaction costs in trading rights**
 * 3. Access costs to users**
 * Long run**
 * Greater incentives for rights holders to**
 * supply copyright works**
 * User innovation is obstructed by the costs**
 * associated with compliance**

how is the supply of creative works affected by (unauthorized copying)? The promotion of innovation and creativity is an explicit, central aim of copyright law

Empirical results on the impact of copyright on the supply of creative works provide an indication of the net effect of all the costs and benefi ts associated with copyright and unauthorised copying.

In particular, studies of supply provide an indication of how consumers’ long-run interests are affected. They also refl ect the net effect on suppliers’ incentives. This issue has not received nearly enough attention. One reason is that it is much harder to obtain decent data on the supply of copyright works than on industry revenues. (p. 12)

another issue that needs to be studied more thoroughly is the relationship between **technological advances and** with technological innovation affecting copyright and vice versa. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1656485
 * copyright.** This relationship may go both ways,
 * Two central questions for copyright**
 * policy are: fi rst, are there opportunities to reduce**
 * the administration costs and transaction costs of**
 * copyright – in particular through the application**
 * of digital ICT – and could public policy encourage**
 * innovation in this respect? Second, how does the**
 * copyright system affect technological change in the**
 * regulated industries?**

( Ned Snow on how fair use should be viewed in the legal system)

From Yokai benkler's presentation

From Yokai benkler's presentation

from http://mediaeducationlab.com/table-contents-teaching-about-copyright-and-fair-use



10.20.10 Eric Eldred publishes literary works on the Internet that have en-tered the public domain. The CTEA prevented certain works from entering the public domain that he intended to provide on his website. Eldred claimed that the CTEA was unconstitutional on two grounds: First, he argued that it violated the Patent and Copyright Clause of the Constitution, which specifies that patents and copyrights are provided for a limited time and that they are authorized in order to promote the “Progress of Science and the useful Arts.”6 Second, Eldred claimed that the CTEA was a violation of free speech. (p.437)

Al-though both factors are likely to be very small, the Eldred economists argue that copyright should not be extended, because copyright im-poses current costs on the creators of new copyrighted items who re-use old material in their new works.(p. 438)

The Eldred case is now resolved; the Supreme Court has found against the petitioners. Nevertheless, active debates in both the legal and economic literatures raise questions regarding the particulars of copyright law and its underlying principles. Thus, the issues raised in the economists’ brief remain important. Critics of copyright are mak-ing bold claims, in some instances even advocating its abolition.3 Scholars in the fields of law and economics will continue to address the economics of copyright duration in the foreseeable future, so it is important that they understand the imperfections in the economists’ brief. This Article provides a counterweight to the amicus brief, iden-tifying some points the economists ignored, clarifying some discus-sions they did not quite get right, and providing data that runs counter to some assumptions they made (p.436)

A major portion of the economists’ Eldred brief is devoted to a purported increase in the costs of creation resulting from copyright extension. They claim that because creative works derive inspiration and form from the creative works of the past, copyright stifles new creation, and extended copyright stifles creation unnecessarily. Their discussion is largely misguided in that it fails to take account of some of the special features of copyright. (p. 452)

The Authors are certainly not the first to note a stewardship role in intellectual property protection. Edmund Kitch argues that patent is better understood as a claim-staking system rather than as a monop-oly, allowing efficient exploitation of a technological realm.22 In a recent paper, William Landes and Richard Posner elaborate on the advantages of copyright ownership, noting the possibility of excessive or inappropriate uses of intellectual properties and the role of copy-right in avoiding the common access problem (p. 448)

10.21 optimal length of copyright? http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1323834 - Unbundling Fair Uses

Can I rip off my dvd? The law is simple - [|http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1…] If you don't own the copyright (and you don't unless you made the movie), you don't have the right to make a copy. You bought the DVD - that gives you the right to own the DVD. (There's no legal way of ripping a DVD, since you'd be making a copy of it and that's illegal.) Legally you have to buy a DVD that has a "digital copy" - that's one copy you can put on a computer or phone.

There's also a law that says that you can make one backup copy. Not to use, just in case the original disk goes bad. (Then the copy becomes the new "original", and you can make one backup of that.)

The two laws contradict each other, but both are in force. Don't blame me - I didn't write them.

All that said, people make copies of DVDs all the time. There are free programs to rip them to vob files, and free programs to convert vob files to the format the iPod uses. Is it legal? No. Do people get "caught"? I've never heard of anyone being prosecuted for it. (from http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101016084615AAm5lEY)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/technology/articles/eldredprimer_100902.htm - the case of Eldred vs ashcroft [] [] - Extensive analysis of the case

RIAA says no http://www.boingboing.net/2006/02/15/riaa_cd_ripping_isnt.html

=**Internet resources**=


 * = Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning ; A good journal = ||

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a909092757~frm=titlelink

http://www.ppomppu.co.kr/zboard/view.php?id=humor&no=52590 - korean hip hop plagiarism http://www.hiphopplaya.com/bbs/bbs/viewbody.html?code=bbs_3&category=43&page=1&sort=1&number=513536&keyfield=&keyfield_category=&key= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwUY0jikZqI - Lessig vs Valent http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVHPyc2m5dk - Copyright and DIY Media [] - US COURTS [] []

1. R enee Hobbs, Media Education Lab at Temple University School of Communications and Theater peter Jaszi, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property in the American University Washington College of Law pat Aufderheide, Center for Social Media at American University School of Communication (2007) The Cost of Copyright Confusion for Media literacy

http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED499465.pdf

2. Optimal length of copyright term

http://www.mediafestival.org/old_site/downloads.html (copyright exam 1) http://www.koce.org/classroom/pdfs/copyrtQuiz.pdf (Copyright exam 2)

10.04. http://mindstorms.lego.com/en-us/community/nxtlog/tos/default.aspx key word with lego digital designer This Site is owned and operated by LEGO A/S, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Denmark, having its principle office in Denmark. LEGO A/S maintains the Site for your personal entertainment and information. Please feel free to browse the Site. You may download material displayed on the Site for limited, non-commercial, personal use only, provided you keep intact all copyright, trademark and other proprietary notices. You may not, however, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute in any way the contents of this Site including the text, images, audio and video for public or commercial purposes, without written permission from LEGO A/S. Please consult our Fair Play Policy at LEGO.com.

Dr.A asked us whether she can download a free software and create a project. But, the thing is that it all depends on the company's policy and you need to take a closer look at their policy. In my opinion, she should have claimed the educational fair use.

The history of open source and software copyright issues

http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2009/07/the-fair-use-test-some-cases-are-easy-some-are-hard-and-some-are-somewhere-in-between-a-follow-up-to-the-dialog-regarding-the-postage-stamp-and-the-korean-war-veterans-memorial/ - Peter Friedman Associate Professor, Legal Analysis & Writing //Case Western Reserve University School of Law : copyright and fair use expert//

Debate

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ925g_Lr74 - **Lessig vs. Valenti-Creativity, Commerce and Culture**
 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwUY0jikZqI&feature=related - lessig vs valenti**
 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hflanQiFSSw&p=6BCAE54217FE96E9&playnext=1&index=18 - youtube debate with Mark cuban vs fred von lohmann**

Fair use

http://www.wcl.american.edu/pijip/go/fair-use -

= **Fair Use and Public Media** =

http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/is-journal/mashup/writings.php

= **10.25** =

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSTvTLCupgw&feature=channel - copyright independent criminal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxxT8-jhbe4&feature=related - Alternative freedom

=Remix/Mashup 2009: The Future of Creative Production and Ownership =

//REMIX//

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCyCc9U97NU&feature=related - DJ Dangerous mouse

===**[|Jonathan McIntosh] ** ===
 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfuwNU0jsk0 - **

=<span style="background-color: transparent; color: #333333; font-size: 1.66em; height: 23px; line-height: 23px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; max-height: 23px; outline-width: 0px; overflow: hidden; padding: 0px;">**<span class="long-title" style="background-color: transparent; font-size: 0.91em; letter-spacing: 0px; margin: 0px; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px;">Donald Duck Meets Glenn Beck in Right Wing Radio Duck ** = <span class="long-title" style="background-color: transparent; font-size: 0.91em; letter-spacing: 0px; margin: 0px; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEK2-8DgEo8&playnext=1&videos=mpLENBz38ZQ&feature=mfu_in_order -

=<span style="background-color: transparent; color: #333333; font-size: 1.66em; height: 23px; line-height: 23px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; max-height: 23px; outline-width: 0px; overflow: hidden; padding: 0px;">**<span class="long-title" style="background-color: transparent; font-size: 0.91em; letter-spacing: 0px; margin: 0px; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px;">Glenn Beck gets "Donald Ducked" - CBS Channel 5 Evening News ** =

//http://rebelliouspixel.com/// .http://www.remixamerica.org/

Below is an abbreviated list of recent and upcoming presentations.
 * [|Digital Media and Learning Conference], Long Beach CA, March 3-5, 2011
 * [|Open Video Conference], New York City – October 1st 2010
 * California State University Northridge, Los Angles CA – March 25th 2010
 * [|South by South West (SxSW)], Austin Texas – March 14th 2010
 * 25 Gallery, Fresno California – January 31st 2010
 * [|World’s Fair Use Day], Washington DC – January 5th 2010
 * Reel Grrls Remix Workshop, Seattle Washington – December 2009
 * [|Interactive Arts and Media], Columbia College Chicago – November 19th 2009


 * [|Open Video Conference], NYU – June 19-20th 2009
 * [|IP/Gender Conference], American University – April 23-24th 2009
 * [|Mashup/Remix Conference], Ohio State – March 12-13th 2009
 * [|Ars Electronica Symposium IV], Linz Austria - September 4-9th 2008
 * [|Fair Use Remix Institute], Chicago IL – July 7-18th 2008


 * [|24/7 DIY Video Summit], USC - February 8-10th 2008
 * [|Networked Publics Conference], USC - April 28-29th 2006

Hi my name is Jonathan McIntosh. I’m a pop culture hacker, video remix artist, photographer, a new media teacher, consultant and a fair-use activist. I’ve also worked on numerous media and social justice related projects in the United States and around the world. In my spare time I help co-edit the blog [|Political Remix Video] and I’m a member of the [|Open Video Alliance]. Political Remix Video: My video work remixes and transforms fragments of mass media pop culture to tell alternative political, social and cultural narratives. Basically I’m a pop culture hacker, but instead of computer code I hack television. My political remixes appear [|online] and also in film festivals, on community tv stations and at new media conferences globally. Last year I was a consultant for the [|Remix America] online project. And last summer I also co-taught a two week intensive workshop called the [|Fair-Use Remix Institute] (FURI) with Chicago youth, using remix video as a media literacy tool. Speaking/Presentations: I give presentations and facilitate workshops on fair use & political remix video, remix video as a media literacy tool, online digital video tools and also about my own transformative remix video works. Contact me [|here] to schedule a speaking engagement or workshop.